Well.
My post yesterday elicited some heated response. Apparently, if Ralph was in power, I'd be drummed out of the Alberta P.C. Party. Apparently, any ham-fisted "nation building" attempted by the United States where they prop up some despot, leading to violence being returned against them (can you say Sadam Hussein and Osama Bin Laden?) is justified by referring to the Iron Curtain and the excesses of communism.
Here's a hint as to how you can tell when someone has nothing to support their argument: They offer nothing, other than to point to someone else who is worse.
They hide behind a flag and suggest you are unpatriotic, that you don't love your own country.
I'm very proud to be Canadian.
And in fact, I believe that Canada is so far ahead of the curve relative to the United States that it is almost laughable.
Internationally, we have never sought to nation-build in the American sense of the word, and economically, we already have a health care system that provides reasonable care for all, without having to cripple our economy to do it. We certainly significant work to attend to the needs of a system in difficulty, however, the point is we have a system in place, and improving that system is hardly going to lead to the ignorant partisan excesses that we're seeing in the U.S. with their "death panels" and whatnot..
Our tax rates are now relatively comparable, and our post-secondary education exceeds most American standards, with the exception of the most elite schools that the vast majority of Americans will never be able to even consider attending anyway.
Our banking system is fundamentally sound, and our judicial system is, with all it's warts, much less interventionist in business, in the sense that Canadian business does not nearly require the attention to tort liability as is the case in the U.S.
Fundamentally, I prefer my own country, Canada, to the United States.
We are a country of the 21st century, while they are slowly realizing that they are a country of the 19th century, not in the sense of their techonological innovation or even their economic power, but in the sense of how they relate to the world around them. They are the last of the great imperialist nations. Except they aren't planting their flag on foreign soil, they seek to plant Exxon and Union Carbide.
I will, however, give the United States credit for one significant advantage. Where the U.S. has it over Canada, is the notion of a national "ideal".
Americans believe in their country in a way that Canadians do not. Words like "freedom" and "liberty" in the U.S. resonate like a national religion.. and this is the shortcoming of Canadian political reality. We are hungry for something to believe in - an ideal to unite us.
That was the point, actually, of my blog.. not to tear down the U.S., but to say, "we need something to believe in."
Sadly, so much of Canadian political reality is based upon little but material benefit. Conservatives see much of their job as retain control of individual financial autonomy, and Liberals and NDP see much of their job as spreading the wealth around. At it's core, so much of our politics is premised on who gets what tax dollars.
And, as most people, even hardline conservatives know - materialism is a hollow religion. Attaining material wealth does not fill the soul. Which we are now seeing. As women are being admitted to the work force in numbers and attaining levels of income unheard of just two generations ago, they are also finding that the "gold ring" they worked so hard to grasp is plastic.
That's my point.
At my heart, I still feel that part of the picture we need to work to attain is to encourage individual responsibility, to reduce our expectations on the state to deliver our needs in a financial sense, and a respect to individual liberty which we often give lip service to.. but we need something more. At our core, we need a leader, we need a party, that we can believe in.
That's my point.
You may say that I'm a dreamer.. but I'm betting that I'm not the only one.
9 comments:
What?!
Our health-care system has sucked us dry and is not even reasonable care, it's tyranny to force government dependence on something as crucial as health and for your information the father of our health-care system Tommy Douglas was a rabid eugenicist and a card carrying communist, Alberta was still using it to sterilize "the weak of mind and body" in the 1980's. look it up.
The USA's personal tax rate is way lower than ours, their state taxes in the red states are way lower than ours.
our taxes are applied on top of taxes for phuck sakes and we pay two levels of income tax!
When I started working all food was nontaxable, baby cloths.. nontaxable, school supplies.. nontaxable and on and on, now there is no product or service that is not taxed to pay for the nanny state., I paid 13% total income tax, 7 to the feds and 6 to the province, there was no GST and PST applied to very few products.
Obama has brought the USA low but it is still a freer and more citizen empowered society than our socialist backwater that's run on faulty ideas no better than the soviets and getting worse yr by yr.
I love this idea that Obama has "brought the USA low" after being handed a country mired in debt, stuck in two unwinnable wars, with a basketcase healthcare system that is a straw away from complete collapse, and an economy that just won't get off the mat. Yet Obama has brought it low because... well, in one year he hasn't been able to bring any sense to the American health industry. Too funny.
BRM..
Montana.
Red State.
In Alberta, total combined tax on $80,000.00 w/ 2 children - $14,802.00
In Montana, total combined tax on $80,000.00 w/ 2 children -
is $11,878.00.
Without any health care coverage at all. Add in another $400 for employee portion of premium only, and now, Montana is costing you a cool $16,600.00 per year for tax and health care.. keeping in mind this doesn't include the Employer portion of health care premiums ($10,000.00)which, if you're in business, we don't pay in Alberta.
So.
If it's so great in the U.S. of A. BRM.. go.
Is it always about money? Perhaps, but a lot of the freedoms we would like to enjoy are based on money even if it's just working less and spending more time with family. You can't really do that, even when living a very modest existance without debt hanging over your head, new cars, new furniture, expensive home, etc. Even living without all of that, you still need money for one reason or another and the more that gets taken from you, the less you have left over to freely use in your own personal life. I think a lot of people are getting tired of that.
I got an email from my uncle the other day, talking about taxes. He served 25 years in the military (2 trips to the Gulf on HMCS Charlottetown were his last excursions), but is hitting age 65 soon. When he does, his military pension will be clawed back (his words) by whatever amount he will get from canada pension. He said 'that's my thanks for 25 years of service'. He signed up, did hit duty, completed 25 years and paid into CP all that time, only to have it taken from his military pension. The same thing happened to my aunt who worked over 25 years for the Justice Dept, and my uncle who served almost 40 years as a police officer. Is that the freedom that Canadians are experiencing? Or is that more like a slap in the face. This was based on some decision made back in the 60s that never changed (NB, not sure if it differs in each province).
Things are far from perfect in the US but I also keep in mind the huge drain on tax dollars that the countless programs create. Same as in Canada and England. My friends over there on disability are often going 6 weeks without any money because things have finally tanked there. It's a total mess for many families. It's going to happen here, and it happens in the US. I heard on the radio this morning that 19 states are going under. Wow. How is adding more programs to the mix going to fix that? But the same thing happens here with millions of dollars being cut from various general programs like health care and schools, but increases going on in social programs such as welfare and AISH. How do we sustain that for much longer and how does that make Canadians want to talk about ideals other than those that center around money? It's hard not to think that way sometimes.
"Here's a hint as to how you can tell when someone has nothing to support their argument: They offer nothing, other than to point to someone else who is worse."
...
"And in fact, I believe that Canada is so far ahead of the curve relative to the United States that it is almost laughable."
Kez.. I'm not for a moment suggesting that money and tax and government spending is irrelevant.
I'm still, at heart, a fiscal conservative, and the biggest reason I wouldn't vote Liberal is that their policy encourages government dependance, and discourages individual initiative and self-reliance.
My point is more philosophical, that whatever we do, should be with an eye to being honest and philosophically consistent.
If we believe in government accountability.. it can't be just "for those guys".
It has to be for us too.
And, it may well be that, for example, the detainee issue is being blown all out of proportion for purely political reasons.. but that doesn't mean we should shy away from answering the tough questions, and sometimes give answers that, in hindsight, might not look perfect.
So what?
I just think that the Conservative party has much going for it, but where it will break down is if we are not careful to assure that we always take the high road, even when it's not the easy road.
And while we're at it, not getting caught up in building straw men, throwing around words like "socialism" as the easy response to anything we don't agree with.
We have a degree of socialism which is perfectly acceptable.
The outcomes vs. cost for example of the free enterprise system vs. the social health care system is demonstrably better in the social health care system.
Umm... Communism was a pretty massive threat and the proxy wars were necessary. They we're also using
Sadam against Iran.
They used Stalin as well to help to fight off the nazi war machine. Not that Stalin's was much different but that it was probably a lot less known back then as to how bad.
Shiner said: "stuck in two unwinnable wars,"
I'm sorry, are you an expert on counter-insurgency wars? An expert on war in general? History? Human capacity? civilization?
We lost less than 150 troops from a cowardly enemy in Afghanistan over many years and you make the assumption that its "unwinnable"?
Go put your head in a toilet and drown yourself...
Your unwinnable.
Your unwinnable.
Fail.
Post a Comment