Monday, June 28, 2010

Liberals: Touting "Evolution", Yet Ignoring Its Lessons

Modern Man:
If Liberals Were in Charge 35,000 Years Ago

Isn't it ironic, don't you think?

Mention the theory of "intelligent design", and every liberal worth their salt will come flying out of their dark little caves in coffee shops and book stores and suddenly begin espousing Charles Darwin, and asserting themselves as experts on the "settled science" of Evolution.

And from my own perspective, so they should.

While evolution may have been a random occurrence of nature, or a creation of an intelligent God, there is no rational denial of the reality that, to simplify, things that work tend to survive and things that don't, tend to, well, not survive.

Funny thing is, however, after finishing their strident defence of the theory of evolution, when they go back to their coffee shops and book stores, they do everything they can do to assure that the theory comes to a full stop for modern man.

In other words..  natural selection be damned.  Regardless of how foolish we are, the state should step up and kiss our boo boos and assure that no negative consequence are suffered as a result of our own stupidity.


Imagine Liberals,however, 35 thousand years ago.  While Cro Magnon man learned to use advanced tools, to organize in cohesive social groups and to hunt with more efficiency when times became lean - the Liberals would have, no doubt, said, "No, this is no good.  Take your food and feed the Neanderthals.

If man had survived the natural cycle of serious global cooling (yes, you heard right "cooling"), there's a good chance we would still be nomadic early humans, with pesky things that intelligent motivated and driven people helped create like, oh, penicillin and electricity, having no part in our development.

Take a look at the world around us today.

There was a reason that North America and Northern Europe in particular were not heavily populated until modern times.  Living there was hard.  The price of being stupid or lazy was death.

There is a reason that equatorial countries have been more heavily populated. Life there was easier.  The price of being stupid or lazy was much less likely to be death.

So - as man becomes more able to function in a hostile environment and as hard work and initiative are shown to allow for expansion of modern man to areas earlier considered unattractive and beyond significant habitation, well, no surprise - not only did man survive and expand in those areas, but they in fact prospered.

To such extent that now, the most stable political and economic systems exist in areas only sparsely inhabited 35,000 years ago. 

And now, the response of our liberal friends, is that the failures of societies in the Sudan, and Niger and Indonesia and elsewhere.. are the fault of the west.

And now, the response of our liberal friends, is that the failures of segments of our society to thrive and prosper..  are the fault of those who succeeded in overcoming their own hardships.

Sure.. there were some who emigrated to Canada from families of wealth - but the great majority of the families that I know had grandparents and great-grandparents who came here will little or nothing.

My own grandfather emigrated to Canada from Hungary with nothing - and worked in mines until scraping some money together to buy a small farm in the Okanagan.  My other grandfather's family were simple farmers, eventually settling in the Sweet Grass Hills, on the southern border of Alberta, living 5 people to a tiny two-room home in the middle of nowhere.

Their hard work, and sacrifice and initiative I am grateful to say was passed on to my parents who passed on some of that (perhaps not enough) to me.. such that our family "evolved" to relative material comfort.

Liberals would penalize my family for that.  They would suggest my grandparents and parents were fools for not simply putting their hand out and demanding government tend to their needs.  That their decision in moving to a harsh and difficult lifestyle was fool-hardy when they could have simply immigrated to one of the larger cities and waited until the government gave them jobs that were easy and without toil.

Liberals would have all of society return to  state of the lowest common denominator - would have us all living as modern-day Neanderthals.

Thank-goodness their time on this earth is passing.

We will all be well-served when, like their predecessors, the only place we see a "liberal" will be on display at a museum.




8 comments:

Alex said...

Some days you make good sense. The world is being built with the stupidest person in mind. If glass were invented today, you would have to take a course to go within 10 feet of it, and need to wear gloves, helmet and goggles when you did. So the stupid prosper which is exactly how socialists like it. -Throngs of idiots in mortal dependence so they can sip champagne.

R. G. Harvie said...

LOL.. "Some days".. I guess even a blind dog finds a bone now and again :)

The_Iceman said...

I believe in natural selection as the primary vehicle for species propogation (and survival), whether or not our society evolved from lightening striking a pool of inorganic chemicals or by the hand of a higher power. Does that mean I'm going to burn in Hell? Maybe, but I did graduate from Protestant Sunday School, I read the Bible and thought it was full of shit at age 9. I live by the rules and engage in moral behavior.

As the saying goes "I don't believe in God, but I'm afraid of him."

Dance...dance to the radio said...

A Darwinian perspective is perfectly conservative.
It does not seek equality of outcomes.
It does not seek equality of cultures.
Conservatism is the perfect function of ability adapting to the environment.

Why don't more conservatives choose to believe in evolution?

R. G. Harvie said...

DD.. you hit on one of the core difficulties with "conservatism" - the inability to ariticulate a definition that unite all "conservatives".

Some, like me, are soft libertarians - who see the struggle for individuality and independance to be a valuable and cherished part of the human experience.

Others, unfortunately, are just the opposite - and they seek to instill some narrow-minded notion of Christianity upon others.

The latter, I hope, are the significant, but loud, minority.

Marissa said...

Please, please read Guns Germs and Steel.

Slinger said...

I've posted a rather extensive reply to this on my blog

lorelei-frolick said...

When you look at history, the factor that is essential to the development of civilization isn’t that people had to work really hard to survive, it’s that they finally achieve the ability to have leisure time to devote to things like art and philosophy and such.

Furthermore, the whole, “Liberals would want us to feed the Neanderthals” argument is totally irrelevant. Even if it was true, it wouldn’t matter. Survival strategies that would have benefitted humans in the stone age are not going to still be the best thing for us in the modern day and age.