Wednesday, January 26, 2011
Analysing the PC Hangover.. the Morning After the Night Before
Well.
Today we wake up with the knowledge that the next Premier of this Province will not be Ed Stelmach.
As the saying goes, we live in interesting times.
This past week, I was having lunch with a former PC MLA we were crystal-balling where things were going in our Province. I suggested that I was curious to see Ted Morton's new website - with Ted looking very "leader-like", with nary a nod to Premier Stelmach.. and I mused that Ted would be leading the PC Party into the next election.
Ron was sceptical, as there is no requirement of a leadership review in the PC Party until after the next election, unless a motion to require a review was passed by a majority of members.
I suggested that, noting Ted Morton's website, a not-so-subtle message may have been given to the Premier that he can go easy, or he can go hard - and I posited that the Premier was likely to step down.
Well.
Call me Nostradamus.
So - what now?
Well, no longer being a PC member, I don't have any "insider" gossip to suggest what's going on - but I think we can speculate.
Firstly - when David Swann suggests that the PC Party is losing to support to the Wild Rose Alliance AND the Liberals - well, as is typical of Dr. Swann, he's delusional. Unhappy PC Members (like myself) have moved to one party - and that party is the Wild Rose Alliance.
That being said - there will be some constituencies where the split vote could give the odd seat to the Liberal party - but those will be few and far between.
The real risk of being deposed from the power is clearly from the Wild Rose Alliance.
And so, forget about Dave Hancock, Thomas Lukaszuk, Gene Zwozdesky, Iris Evans - or anyone north of Calgary. Been there, done that - the party will not go that route again. The PC Party is all about holding onto power - and the conventional wisdom inside the party is that money buys elections.. so expect the leader to come from oiltown.
Now - Ron Liepert could, perhaps have made a charge - but his handling of health care could fairly be said to be abysmal and while he's now the Minister of Energy, he doesn't have a legitimate shot.
I've heard rumours that Alison Redford might be interested. Not going to happen - she's too green and hasn't done anything to distinguish herself. As a lawyer, I can tell you that the handling of Justice looks like Barack Obama's wet dream - all full of heavy-handed government intervention and spending without appreciable results.
Lloyd Snelgrove? Not from Calgary and, as President of the Treasury Board since 2006, and therefore the over-seer of the worst bout of pointless over-spending since the Getty government - he's the last person the party will see as the leader-to-be.
They want a fiscal hawk, and, just as important, they know full-well that as bright and dedicated as Premier Stelmach has been - he hasn't shown the personal charisma to capture the imagination of Albertans. Take a good look at the PC caucus - and ask, "who fits this bill?"
The closest one, clearly, is Ted Morton.
Look to see a tepid leadership race, perhaps with Lukaszuk, Snelgrove and Liepert and at least one woman for appearances sake - probably Iris Evans or Alison Redford - going through the motions, possibly to raise their profile for future shot. Ultimately, however, the "election" of Ted Morton will amount to a coronation.
Too little, too late?
A lot could happen between now and 2013, but Nostradumus says, look to a PC Minority government with a strong showing by the Wild Rose - resulting in a government than can no longer take average Albertans for granted, and which will have it's toes kept to the fire by a true conservative conscience.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

4 comments:
I would agree with your posits arriving at Morton as the logical choice. I would, however, be concerned about Morton being perceived as being too far to the right. True, the PCs have taken flak for being more "Progressive" and less "Conservative" as of late, and a shift more towards their (natural?) right is expected moving forward. However, I would think the PCs would be worried about going too far to the political right and being seen as not different enough from the Wildrose's values.
Stelmach's last comments were about a "hidden agenda" and a caution about the upcoming "American style" politics (perhaps a "nod" to the idea they've moved left, as those comments were eerily reminiscent of those commonly used by the Federal Liberals to scare voters away from the opposition...)
At any rate, I'm not sure that is indicative of a shift as far to the right as Morton would end up representing - if any comments made by Stelmach at this juncture can be seen as indicative of anything to do with the future of the party. And of that, I'm not sure.
Think about the Getty years.
The PC Party was in massive trouble - Lawrence Decore was gaining ground as a "conservative" Liberal, and the years of waste under Don Getty were notorious.
They knew they needed a massive change and new blood to recapture the imagination of the public - and, voila, Ralph Klein elected leader.
I don't for a moment consider Ed Stelmach another Don Getty - but the problem for the party is similar. They need to recapture the public imagination as a "reformed" PC Party to succeed, and so they are going to need either:
a) a perceived hard-core right wing in the party (there is no one other than Morton to fill that bill); or
b) a leader of great charisma and profile to come from outside the party.
I'm not seeing any names of anyone outside the party who would be considered immediately "saleable" to the public.. no former Mayors of Edmonton or Calgary, no high profile business people, no quasi-celebrity with credentials.
There is just Ted Morton.
Regarding the Premier's comments - I think they were directed at Danielle Smith, clearly - but it could backfire by watering down any perception of Ted Morton being the "new Sheriff in town".
On Danielle Smith's facebook page just a few days before the announcement from Stelmach, she had posted about talks between the PCs and WRA about merging because they felt they were 'splitting votes'. My boyfriend commented on that post on her page and read it out to me along with other people's comments, but now I can't find it! I was going to grab a quote from it and I can't find it anywhere!! Anyhow at that time, my bf said 'gee and what's going to happen there? Merge and then Smith will take over being premier?'. So when I read the news headline yesterday about Stelmach, I texted him right away and he wrote back 'I must be psychic'.
But now, as I mentioned above, I cannot seem to find that post anywhere on Smith's FB page. Was it removed or am I just cross-eyed this morning and can't see it. I just find it very strange. Immediately upon coming home last night, my bf posted the Stelmach story from the Herald on his FB page and said ""I smell a rat.......been talk of merging with the WRA..........why? Because they "are affraid of splitting the right wing votes.
So first,the WRA is against all of the PC policies,attacks them over their policies and now.........what a ruse....""
So I know I'm not losing my mind, he saw that on the WRA-Smith page. At any rate, something strange seems to be going on.
Yet yesterday Smith says talks of a merger are "the dumbest thing she's ever heard"..
Post a Comment